Friendship Village Tempe has a 3 out of 5 star overall rating. Its staffing rating is very low at 1 out of 5 stars, while health inspection and quality measures are both 4 out of 5 stars; there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: May 1, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Staffing detail
Total staff turnover: 47%
Registered nurse turnover: 41%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—24.4%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
10%13%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
14.8%5.2%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
5%0%Improving
Residents who lost too much weight
—13.7%—
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—14%—
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—10.1%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—9.4%—
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
1%0%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
—0%—
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
—31.8%—
Residents with depressive symptoms
5%0%Improving
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—76%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—92.7%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%99.1%Worsening
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide needed care and help with daily activities for residents who could not do them on their own. Cited January 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 677 — 42 CFR §483.24(a)(2) — S/S: E
The home failed to ensure residents’ medications were free from unnecessary drugs. Cited January 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 757 — 42 CFR §483.45(d) — S/S: E
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited January 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited January 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to post its nurse staffing information every day, so families could not easily see daily staffing levels. Cited October 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 732 — 42 CFR §483.35(i) — S/S: E
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Chain
Part of LIFE CARE SERVICES · 44 homes · 4 stars avg
Occupancy
57.1 residents on an average day (45% of 128 beds)
Resident voice
Resident & family councils
Medicare history
Certified for 45 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.