GoodStanding

Nursing home report

Fairlane Gardens Nursing & Rehab

Registered name: Fairlane Gardens Nursing and Rehab at Reading

READING, PA · Medicare-certified · 124 beds

Needs attention
For-profitChain member
Data as of September 1, 2026
1 of 5 overall

Fairlane Gardens Nursing & Rehab in Reading, PA has a 1-star overall rating, with a 1-star health inspection rating and 2-star staffing rating; its reported nurse staffing is 3.08 hours per resident per day, below the 4.1-hour federal benchmark. The facility also has $101,602 in fines in the last 24 months and a recent federal penalty, while its quality measures rating is 4 stars.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

3.0845 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: July 17, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $101,602recent federal penalty

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 3.0845.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
0.49
Licensed practical nurses
0.71
Nurse aides
1.88
Weekend nursing
2.79

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 47%
Registered nurse turnover: 50%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

18%13.8%Improving

Residents with a fall causing major injury

4.1%3.9%No change

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

3.3%1%Improving

Residents with a urinary tract infection

4.2%0%Improving

Residents who lost too much weight

6.6%8.2%Worsening

Residents who were physically restrained

0%0%No change

Residents needing more help with daily activities

13.3%16.3%Worsening

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

17.4%14.9%Improving

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

18.5%20.8%Worsening

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

0%4.5%Worsening

Residents with a long-term catheter

2.1%0.9%Improving

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

17.5%18.4%Worsening

Residents with depressive symptoms

8%7.5%Improving

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

—96.9%—

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

83.5%63.1%Worsening

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

—60.2%—

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

38.7%5.2%Worsening

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited March 2026 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: K

The home failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment and daily care supports were provided safely. Cited July 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 584 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited August 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: E

The home failed to provide appropriate care to help a resident maintain or improve movement and mobility. Cited July 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 688 — 42 CFR §483.25(c) — S/S: E

The home failed to provide enough nursing staff each day and ensure a licensed nurse was in charge on every shift. Cited June 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 725 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: D

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  3. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.

  4. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  5. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.

  6. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  7. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $101,602 was recorded.

  8. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $156,310 was recorded.

  9. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.

  10. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  11. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  12. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Penalties & enforcement

On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $101,602 in total fines.

  • Federal fine

    Mar 24, 2026

    $101,602

Operator & ownership

Recent ownership change · May 14, 2018

Now operated by Fairlane Gardens Nursing and Rehab at Reading, previously Exeter Greens Care and Rehabilitation Center.

Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Part of LME FAMILY HOLDINGS · 15 homes · 2.1 stars avg
Occupancy
117.9 residents on an average day (95% of 124 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 43 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.