Elizabeth Seton Residence in Wellesley, MA has an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, with a 5-star health inspection rating but a 1-star staffing rating and 2-star quality measures rating. There were no fines in the last 24 months, and recent inspection citations focused on care planning and respiratory care.
Last inspection: August 27, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Staffing detail
Total staff turnover: 23%
Registered nurse turnover: 23%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
9.1%26.8%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
1.6%8.3%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
3.1%3.6%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
9.5%1.7%Improving
Residents who lost too much weight
5.9%6.1%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
36.7%24.4%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
52.2%27.6%Improving
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
7.8%11.8%Worsening
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
1.2%0%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
1.3%0%Improving
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
41.3%34%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%0%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—91%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
61.9%100%Improving
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—77.9%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
86.4%96%Improving
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited August 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: E
The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited September 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: D
The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited August 2023 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: D
The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited August 2023 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: D
The home failed to safeguard residents’ private information and keep each resident’s medical records properly maintained. Cited August 2023 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 842 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Occupancy
87.5 residents on an average day (104% of 84 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 45 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.