The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited July 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
Nursing home report
EL REPOSO NURSING FACILITY
FLORENCE, AL · Medicare-certified · 60 beds
In good standing
For-profit
4 of 5 overall
El Reposo Nursing Facility in Florence, AL has a 4-star overall rating, with strong quality measures (5 stars) and staffing (4 stars) above the federal benchmark at 4.54 hours per resident day versus 4.1. It has a 3-star health inspection rating, no fines in the last 24 months, and recent citations in food handling, resident rights, and care planning.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
4.5363 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: July 3, 2024Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.5363.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 0.46
- Licensed practical nurses
- 0.95
- Nurse aides
- 3.13
- Weekend nursing
- 3.70
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 47%
Registered nurse turnover: 38%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
27.3%27.3%No change
Residents with a fall causing major injury
8.8%3.6%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
5.5%6.9%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
12.3%10.9%Improving
Residents who lost too much weight
14.8%15.1%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
8.1%11.1%Worsening
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—12.1%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
51.9%50.9%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%1.2%Worsening
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
13.2%26.8%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%0%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—98.3%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—97.1%—
What the inspectors found
The home failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and could make their own choices and communicate freely. Cited June 2018 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 550 — 42 CFR §483.10(a) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited June 2018 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to make survey results easy for residents to see and to help them contact advocate agencies. Cited June 2018 — widespread issue, minimal harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 577 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: C
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Occupancy
- 58.5 residents on an average day (98% of 60 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 37 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.