GoodStanding

Nursing home report

DOUGLAS MANOR

WINDHAM, CT · Medicare-certified · 90 beds

Needs attention
For-profitChain member
Data as of July 1, 2026
1 of 5 overall

Douglas Manor in Windham, CT has a 1-star overall rating, with a 1-star health inspection rating, 2-star quality measures, and 4-star staffing rating. It reports 3.57 nurse staffing hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark, and it has had $8,278 in fines in the last 24 months plus a recent federal penalty.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

3.5743 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: April 8, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $8,278recent federal penalty

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 3.5743.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
0.52
Licensed practical nurses
1.08
Nurse aides
1.97
Weekend nursing
3.28

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 32%
Registered nurse turnover: 10%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

23.2%23.1%No change

Residents with a fall causing major injury

5.6%1.3%Improving

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

4.6%5.7%Worsening

Residents with a urinary tract infection

0%5.3%Worsening

Residents who lost too much weight

1.5%9.6%Worsening

Residents who were physically restrained

0%0%No change

Residents needing more help with daily activities

25%24.2%Improving

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

19.2%19.8%Worsening

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

11.6%24.3%Worsening

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

0%0%No change

Residents with a long-term catheter

2.5%2.3%No change

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

10%22.1%Worsening

Residents with depressive symptoms

0%1.5%Worsening

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

96.2%

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

94.4%73.7%Worsening

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

54.1%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

60.5%42.3%Worsening

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited October 2025 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: G

The home failed to let the resident help develop and carry out their own care plan. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 553 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E

The home failed to protect residents’ right to organize and take part in resident and family groups. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 565 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to honor a resident’s right to manage their own money and financial affairs. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 567 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E

The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited April 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: E

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  3. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $8,278 was recorded.

  4. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.

  5. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $12,735 was recorded.

  6. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  7. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  8. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 18 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Penalties & enforcement

On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $8,278 in total fines.

  • Federal fine

    Oct 15, 2025

    $8,278

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Part of RYDERS HEALTH MANAGEMENT · 8 homes · 1.5 stars avg
Occupancy
82.3 residents on an average day (91% of 90 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 50 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.