GoodStanding

Nursing home report

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community

Registered name: Deerfield Episcopal Retirement

Asheville, NC · Medicare-certified · 62 beds

In good standing
Non-profit
Data as of July 1, 2026
5 of 5 overall

Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community has an overall 5-star rating, with 5 stars for health inspections and staffing, but only 2 stars for quality measures. It reports 5.44 nurse staffing hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark, with $0 in fines in the last 24 months.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

5.4413 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: June 4, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.4413.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
1.60
Licensed practical nurses
0.79
Nurse aides
3.05
Weekend nursing
4.69

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 29%
Registered nurse turnover: 14%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

17.2%16.7%Improving

Residents with a fall causing major injury

5.6%8.8%Worsening

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

8%6.4%Improving

Residents with a urinary tract infection

7.8%3.5%Improving

Residents who lost too much weight

2.9%2.6%No change

Residents who were physically restrained

0%0%No change

Residents needing more help with daily activities

13.9%18.4%Worsening

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

19.4%14.2%Improving

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

10.8%17.9%Worsening

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

9.1%

Residents with a long-term catheter

1.4%5.8%Worsening

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

40.3%40.5%No change

Residents with depressive symptoms

0%0%No change

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

98.3%

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

96.3%98.2%Improving

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

83.3%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

83.9%72%Worsening

What the inspectors found

The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited February 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited June 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: D

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  3. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  4. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  5. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Occupancy
59 residents on an average day (95% of 62 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 13 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.