Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has a 5 out of 5 overall rating, with strong quality measures and staffing ratings at 5 and 4 stars respectively. It reported 4.24 nurse staffing hours per resident per day versus the 4.1 federal benchmark, had 0 fines in the last 24 months, and its health inspection rating was 4 stars.
Last inspection: September 11, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.2414.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.80
Licensed practical nurses
0.76
Nurse aides
2.68
Weekend nursing
3.94
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 44%
Registered nurse turnover: 56%
Resident outcomes
How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
0%Steady
Residents with a fall causing major injury
7.1%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
2.1%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%Steady
Residents who lost too much weight
0.7%Steady
Residents who were physically restrained
0%Steady
Residents needing more help with daily activities
5.2%Steady
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
3.2%Steady
Show all measures
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
18.7%Worsening
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%Steady
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%Steady
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
5.4%Steady
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%Steady
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
100%Steady
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%Steady
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
100%Steady
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%Steady
What the inspectors found
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited September 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to keep its areas safe, easy to use, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. Cited February 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 921 — 42 CFR §483.90 — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to make sure each resident got an accurate assessment of their needs and condition. Cited September 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 641 — 42 CFR §483.20(g) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited September 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: D
The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited September 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of MAXIMUS HEALTHCARE GROUP · 7 homes · 4.6 stars avg
Occupancy
45.8 residents on an average day (76% of 60 beds)
Resident voice
Resident & family councils
Medicare history
Certified for 26 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.