The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited June 2024 — limited pattern, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: H
Nursing home report
Crescent City Skilled Nursing
Registered name: CRESCENT CITY CARE CENTER
CRESCENT CITY, CA · Medicare-certified · 99 beds
Needs attention
Special Focus candidateNew ownership (past 12 mo)For-profitChain member
Data as of September 1, 2026
1 of 5 overall
Crescent City Skilled Nursing has a 1-star overall rating, with 1-star health inspection and staffing ratings and 2-star quality measures. It is a Special Focus Facility candidate; reported staffing is 3.53 hours per resident per day, below the federal benchmark of 4.1, and there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
3.5329 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: July 29, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0special focus facility
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 3.5329.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 0.23
- Licensed practical nurses
- 1.42
- Nurse aides
- 1.89
- Weekend nursing
- 3.23
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 69%
Registered nurse turnover: 89%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
53.1%39%Improving
Residents with a fall causing major injury
1.4%2.6%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
3.8%2.6%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%2.8%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
11.9%11.8%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
26.2%15.9%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
14.1%11.8%Improving
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
4.4%2.8%Improving
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
14.3%6.5%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%0%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
22.9%9.1%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
3.1%7.2%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—96%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
97.3%100%Improving
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—66%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
91.9%94.9%Improving
What the inspectors found
The home failed to provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy. Cited June 2024 — limited pattern, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 692 — 42 CFR §483.25(g) — S/S: H
The home failed to run its operations effectively and efficiently using its available resources. Cited June 2024 — isolated incident, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 835 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: G
The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited March 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: F
The home failed to provide enough nursing staff each day and ensure a licensed nurse was in charge on every shift. Cited March 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 725 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: F
Recent history
- OWNERSHIP
The facility reported a change in ownership in the past 12 months.
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- OWNERSHIP
The facility reported a change in ownership in the past 12 months.
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 23 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- PENALTY
A federal fine of $60,700 was recorded.
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- PENALTY
A federal payment denial was recorded.
- PENALTY
A federal fine of $144,866 was recorded.
Penalties & enforcement
On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $144,866 in total fines · 1 payment denial.
- 91 days
Medicare/Medicaid payment denial
Jun 21, 2024
- $144,866
Federal fine
Jun 21, 2024
Operator & ownership
Recent ownership change · Nov 4, 2025
Now operated by Crescent City Care Center, previously Crescent City Skilled Nursing.
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Part of DAVID JOHNSON · 48 homes · 3.3 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 84.9 residents on an average day (86% of 99 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 55 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.