5 of 5 stars overall. Community Pride Care Center has strong overall ratings, including 4 of 5 for health inspections and 5 of 5 for quality measures, but staffing is 3 of 5 with reported nurse staffing below the federal benchmark (3.05 vs. 4.1 hours per resident per day). It had $0 in fines in the last 24 months, though recent inspection citations included infection control, antibiotic-use monitoring, and care planning.
Last inspection: December 31, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 3.0496.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.65
Licensed practical nurses
0.33
Nurse aides
2.06
Weekend nursing
2.54
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 49%
Registered nurse turnover: 22%
Resident outcomes
How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
2%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
1.2%Steady
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
3.7%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4%Improving
Residents who lost too much weight
0.8%Improving
Residents who were physically restrained
0%Steady
Residents needing more help with daily activities
25.7%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
7.9%Steady
Show all measures
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
34.4%Improving
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%Steady
Residents with a long-term catheter
1.1%Improving
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
28.8%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
10.9%Improving
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
100%Steady
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%Steady
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%Steady
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited December 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The home failed to monitor antibiotic use properly. Cited December 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 881 — 42 CFR §483.80 — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited November 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: E
The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited December 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: D
The home failed to respond appropriately to all reported abuse or neglect concerns. Cited April 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 610 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing was below the federal recommendation of 4.1 hours per resident per day.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Government - City/county
Occupancy
45.2 residents on an average day (90% of 50 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 29 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.