Community Nursing Home of Anaconda has a 3 out of 5 overall rating, with 3-star health inspections, 4-star staffing, and 3-star quality measures. It reported 5.25 nursing hours per resident per day, above the 4.1 federal benchmark, and had no fines in the last 24 months; recent citations included nurse leadership, staffing data submission, and QAPI/QAA process requirements.
Last inspection: December 17, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.2496.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
1.14
Licensed practical nurses
0.79
Nurse aides
3.32
Weekend nursing
4.75
Hours per resident per day.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—17%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
—1.5%—
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
—8.7%—
Residents with a urinary tract infection
—0%—
Residents who lost too much weight
—0%—
Residents who were physically restrained
—0%—
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—20.8%—
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—22%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—6.6%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
—7.2%—
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
—32.3%—
Residents with depressive symptoms
—0%—
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—95.2%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—97%—
What the inspectors found
The home failed to have a registered nurse on duty enough hours each day and to keep a registered nurse as the full-time director of nursing. Cited December 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 727 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: F
The home failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information based on verifiable records. Cited December 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 851 — 42 CFR §483.70 — S/S: F
The home failed to have a plan for how it would carry out quality improvement and oversight activities. Cited December 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 865 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited December 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to keep medication mistakes below the allowed level. Cited December 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 759 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(1) — S/S: E
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 13 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Occupancy
17.6 residents on an average day (28% of 62 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 49 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.