GoodStanding

Nursing home report

College Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Sacramento, CA · Medicare-certified · 120 beds

Needs attention
For-profitChain member
Data as of July 1, 2026
3 of 5 overall

College Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, with stronger staffing and quality ratings at 4 out of 5 stars and nurse staffing slightly above the federal benchmark (4.33 vs. 4.1 hours per resident per day). It has had $9,814 in fines in the last 24 months and a recent federal penalty; recent inspection issues included discharge planning, access to vision and hearing services, and food handling standards.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

4.3272 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: May 29, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $9,814recent federal penalty

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.3272.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
0.81
Licensed practical nurses
0.97
Nurse aides
2.55
Weekend nursing
3.92

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 40%
Registered nurse turnover: 47%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

5.8%6.8%Worsening

Residents with a fall causing major injury

2.8%2.6%No change

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

2.2%3.4%Worsening

Residents with a urinary tract infection

0%1.3%Worsening

Residents who lost too much weight

1.5%8.2%Worsening

Residents who were physically restrained

0%0%No change

Residents needing more help with daily activities

5%13.4%Worsening

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

18.2%

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

12.1%8.2%Improving

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

0.9%0%Improving

Residents with a long-term catheter

0%0%No change

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

9.1%20.2%Worsening

Residents with depressive symptoms

1.5%1.3%No change

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

91.2%

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%100%No change

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

87.9%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

96%92.5%Worsening

What the inspectors found

The home failed to make sure the resident’s transfer or discharge met their needs and preferences and was safe. Cited November 2025 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 627 — 42 CFR §483.15(c) — S/S: J

The nursing home failed to make sure a resident could get needed vision and hearing services. Cited February 2024 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 685 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: G

The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited April 2026 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F

The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited February 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: E

The home failed to provide pharmacy services and a licensed pharmacist needed to meet each resident’s medication needs. Cited February 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 755 — 42 CFR §483.45 — S/S: E

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  3. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  4. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  5. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $9,814 was recorded.

  6. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  7. PENALTY

    A federal fine of $14,020 was recorded.

  8. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  9. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 10 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  10. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found

Penalties & enforcement

On record with Medicare: 1 fine · $9,814 in total fines.

  • Federal fine

    Nov 20, 2025

    $9,814

Operator & ownership

Recent ownership change · Mar 20, 2019

Now operated by College Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, previously College Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center.

Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Part of CYPRESS HEALTHCARE GROUP · 13 homes · 3.8 stars avg
Occupancy
115 residents on an average day (96% of 120 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 56 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.