CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE has an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, with 5-star health inspection and staffing ratings, but a lower 2-star quality measures rating. It reports 4.50 nurse staffing hours per resident per day, above the federal benchmark of 4.1, and had $0 in fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: May 9, 2024Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.4956.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.64
Licensed practical nurses
0.95
Nurse aides
2.91
Weekend nursing
3.72
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 29%
Registered nurse turnover: 22%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
18%9.3%Improving
Residents with a fall causing major injury
5.3%0%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
3.5%7.7%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7%0%Improving
Residents who lost too much weight
2%0%Improving
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
33.3%28.6%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
31.2%12.6%Improving
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
32.7%32.1%Improving
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
—0%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
1.7%0%Improving
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
26.6%19.7%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%0%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%90.9%Worsening
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—81.8%—
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited May 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: D
The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited May 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: D
The home failed to provide appropriate care to help a resident maintain or improve movement and mobility. Cited May 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 688 — 42 CFR §483.25(c) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited April 2023 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of TREND CONSULTANTS · 16 homes · 3.3 stars avg
Occupancy
56.4 residents on an average day (94% of 60 beds)
Resident voice
Resident & family councils
Medicare history
Certified for 4 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.