The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited December 2023 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: K
Nursing home report
DAINGERFIELD, TX · Medicare-certified · 106 beds
Capstone Healthcare of Daingerfield has a 1-star overall rating, with a 1-star health inspection rating and 2-star quality measures, while staffing is rated 3 stars; reported nurse staffing is 4.36 hours per resident per day, slightly above the federal benchmark of 4.1. It also has $85,885 in fines in the last 24 months and a recent federal penalty, with recent cited concerns involving abuse, neglect, and theft prevention and response.
Health inspections
Staffing
4.3567 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.3567.
Hours per resident per day.
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
Residents with a fall causing major injury
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
Residents with a urinary tract infection
Residents who lost too much weight
Residents who were physically restrained
Residents needing more help with daily activities
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
Residents with a long-term catheter
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
Residents with depressive symptoms
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
The nursing home failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect by others. Cited December 2023 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.
F-Tag 600 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: K
The home failed to have policies and procedures in place to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. Cited December 2023 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.
F-Tag 607 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: K
The home failed to respond appropriately to all reported abuse or neglect concerns. Cited December 2023 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.
F-Tag 610 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: K
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited February 2025 — isolated incident, immediate jeopardy to residents.
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: J
The nursing home failed to provide proper pressure ulcer care and failed to prevent new pressure sores from developing. Cited February 2024 — limited pattern, actual harm.
F-Tag 686 — 42 CFR §483.25(b) — S/S: H
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
Health inspection found 24 health deficiencies.
A federal fine of $85,885 was recorded.
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
Health inspection found 13 health deficiencies.
On record with Medicare: 5 fines · $301,425 in total fines.
Federal fine
Feb 28, 2025
Federal fine
Feb 27, 2024
Federal fine
Feb 12, 2024
Federal fine
Jan 22, 2024
Federal fine
Dec 28, 2023
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.