Burnett Medical Center has a 2 out of 5 overall rating, with stronger staffing (4 out of 5 and 5.73 hours per resident per day above the 4.1 federal benchmark) but weak quality measures at 1 out of 5. It had no fines in the last 24 months, but recent inspection citations included infection control, psychotropic medication use, and drug storage/labelling issues.
Last inspection: January 29, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.7336.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
1.43
Licensed practical nurses
1.23
Nurse aides
3.07
Weekend nursing
4.76
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 58%
Registered nurse turnover: 67%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—22%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
7.4%4.3%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
0%5.3%Worsening
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%4.3%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
—4.5%—
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—25%—
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—17.8%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—8.7%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%2.8%Worsening
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
30.4%16.9%Improving
Residents with depressive symptoms
7.7%9.1%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
59.3%87%Improving
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited October 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The home failed to prevent unnecessary mind-altering medications or ensure medicines did not limit a resident’s ability to function. Cited January 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 605 — 42 CFR §483.12 — S/S: E
The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited October 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to provide the required notice or documentation about a resident’s needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policy. Cited January 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 628 — 42 CFR §483.15(c)(2) — S/S: D
The home failed to honor residents’ choices about treatment, research participation, and advance care instructions. Cited January 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 578 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Occupancy
25.6 residents on an average day (51% of 50 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 31 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.