GoodStanding

Nursing home report

BRIGHTON CARE CENTER

PASADENA, CA · Medicare-certified · 99 beds

In good standing
For-profit
2 of 5 overall

Brighton Care Center in Pasadena has a 2 out of 5 overall rating, with 2-star health inspection, staffing, and quality measures ratings. It reported 4.21 nurse staffing hours per resident per day, slightly above the federal benchmark of 4.1, with $0 in fines in the last 24 months.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

4.215 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: January 29, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.215.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
0.49
Licensed practical nurses
1.28
Nurse aides
2.45
Weekend nursing
3.63

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 57%
Registered nurse turnover: 69%

Resident outcomes

How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

14.2%Worsening

Residents with a fall causing major injury

2.8%Worsening

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

11%Improving

Residents with a urinary tract infection

3.1%Improving

Residents who lost too much weight

12.4%Improving

Residents who were physically restrained

0%Steady

Residents needing more help with daily activities

20.9%Worsening

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

17.1%Worsening
Show all measures

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

7.5%Worsening

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

1.1%Improving

Residents with a long-term catheter

3.1%Improving

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

16.4%Worsening

Residents with depressive symptoms

11.2%Worsening

Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

100%Steady

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%Steady

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

95.8%Steady

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%Steady

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, actual harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: G

The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited January 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: E

The home failed to provide pharmacy services and a licensed pharmacist needed to meet each resident’s medication needs. Cited January 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 755 — 42 CFR §483.45 — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to keep medication mistakes below the allowed level. Cited January 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 759 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(1) — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Cited January 2026 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 760 — 42 CFR §483.45(f)(2) — S/S: E

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 17 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  4. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Occupancy
85.9 residents on an average day (87% of 99 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 37 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.