The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited July 2019 — isolated incident, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: G
Nursing home report
Bradbury Commons
PONCA CITY, OK · Medicare-certified · 68 beds
In good standing
Non-profit
4 of 5 overall
Bradbury Commons (PONCA CITY, OK) has a 4 out of 5 star overall rating, with a 5-star health inspection rating but a 1-star staffing rating and 3-star quality measures rating. It had $0 in fines over the last 24 months; recent inspection citations included respiratory care, resident rights/advance directives, and pharmaceutical services.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
Quality measures
Last inspection: July 3, 2024Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
16.1%3.7%Improving
Residents with a fall causing major injury
2.1%4.1%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
13.2%8.5%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%0%No change
Residents who lost too much weight
3%3.1%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
36.4%21.2%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—32.2%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
9.1%11.8%Worsening
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%3.4%Worsening
Residents with a long-term catheter
0%1.5%Worsening
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
27.6%36.6%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
6.4%8.5%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—95.9%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
97.9%79.6%Worsening
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—77.1%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
67.7%81.1%Improving
What the inspectors found
The home failed to honor residents’ choices about treatment, research participation, and advance care instructions. Cited July 2019 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 578 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E
The home failed to provide pharmacy services and a licensed pharmacist needed to meet each resident’s medication needs. Cited July 2019 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 755 — 42 CFR §483.45 — S/S: E
The home failed to properly reduce or limit psychotropic medication use and try safer non-drug approaches when appropriate. Cited July 2019 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 758 — 42 CFR §483.45(e) — S/S: E
The home failed to give an adequate reason and proper information when transferring or discharging a resident. Cited July 2019 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 622 — 42 CFR §483.15 — S/S: D
Recent history
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 7 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Occupancy
- 61.4 residents on an average day (90% of 68 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 18 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.