Bishop Noa Home for Senior Citizens in Escanaba, MI has an overall 3-star rating. Its staffing is a major concern at 1 star, while health inspections are 4 stars and quality measures are 3 stars; there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: May 1, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports not reported.
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
8.5%12%Worsening
Residents with a fall causing major injury
3%0%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
8.5%2.7%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%3.1%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
8.5%5%Improving
Residents who were physically restrained
0%1.5%Worsening
Residents needing more help with daily activities
16.4%15.5%Improving
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
14.7%19.1%Worsening
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
10%6.6%Improving
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%0%No change
Residents with a long-term catheter
1.3%1.2%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
34.1%33.6%No change
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%3.2%Worsening
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%100%No change
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—88%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%89.5%Worsening
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited March 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited March 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to make sure its quality review group had the required members and met at least every three months. Cited March 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 868 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: F
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited December 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: E
The home failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment and daily care supports were provided safely. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 584 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D
Recent history
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Occupancy
67.1 residents on an average day (83% of 81 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 16 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.