GoodStanding

Nursing home report

Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Health Care Center

Charleston, SC · Medicare-certified · 41 beds

In good standing
Non-profit
5 of 5 overall

Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Health Care Center in Charleston has an overall 5-star rating, with strong staffing and quality measures and no fines in the last 24 months. Its nurse staffing is above the federal benchmark (5.59 vs. 4.1 hours per resident per day), though its health inspection rating is 4 stars and recent inspection citations included infection control, food handling, and medication storage issues.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

5.5868 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: April 25, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.5868.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
1.45
Licensed practical nurses
1.28
Nurse aides
2.85
Weekend nursing
5.18

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 25%
Registered nurse turnover: 18%

Resident outcomes

Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.

Negative outcomes

Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

1.1%0%Improving

Positive outcomes

Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).

Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine

92%

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%99.1%Worsening

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited February 2022 — limited pattern, immediate jeopardy to residents.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: K

The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited March 2024 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: F

The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited February 2022 — widespread issue, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: F

The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited April 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: D

The nursing home failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality. Cited April 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 658 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(3) — S/S: D

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  4. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Occupancy
25.9 residents on an average day (63% of 41 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 8 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.