GoodStanding

Nursing home report

BIGFORK VALLEY COMMUNITIES

BIGFORK, MN · Medicare-certified · 40 beds

In good standing
Government-run
5 of 5 overall

BIGFORK VALLEY COMMUNITIES has an overall 5-star rating, with strong staffing (5 stars) and nurse staffing above the federal benchmark (5.29 vs 4.1 hours per resident per day), but a lower quality-measures rating of 2 stars. It had 4 stars on health inspections and no fines in the last 24 months.

Facility ratings

Health inspections

Staffing

5.2934 hrs/resident/day

Quality measures

Last inspection: December 11, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0

Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.2934.

Staffing detail

Registered nurses
1.97
Licensed practical nurses
0.36
Nurse aides
2.97
Weekend nursing
4.44

Hours per resident per day.

Total staff turnover: 27%
Registered nurse turnover: 11%

Resident outcomes

How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.

Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication

11.1%Steady

Residents with a fall causing major injury

0%Steady

Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)

2.5%Steady

Residents with a urinary tract infection

7.6%Steady

Residents who lost too much weight

2.7%Steady

Residents who were physically restrained

0%Steady

Residents needing more help with daily activities

25.3%Steady

Residents whose ability to walk got worse

22.3%Steady
Show all measures

Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication

22.7%Steady

Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic

0%Steady

Residents with a long-term catheter

3.9%Steady

Residents with new or worsening incontinence

29%Steady

Residents with depressive symptoms

3.2%Steady

Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%Steady

Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine

100%Steady

What the inspectors found

The nursing home failed to develop and follow policies to make sure residents received flu and pneumonia vaccinations. Cited November 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 883 — 42 CFR §483.80 — S/S: E

The nursing home failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to residents' orders, preferences, and goals. Cited December 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 684 — 42 CFR §483.25 — S/S: D

The home failed to protect residents’ right to complain without fear and did not ensure grievances were handled promptly. Cited November 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 585 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: D

The home failed to ensure residents kept their ability to do everyday activities unless there was a medical reason. Cited October 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 676 — 42 CFR §483.24 — S/S: D

The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited October 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.

View the original federal record

F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: D

Recent history

  1. STAFFING

    Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.

  2. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found
  3. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.

    See what inspectors found
  4. INSPECTION

    Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.

    See what inspectors found

Operator & ownership

Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Occupancy
21.5 residents on an average day (54% of 40 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 38 years

Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.