The nursing home failed to provide proper pressure ulcer care and failed to prevent new pressure sores from developing. Cited February 2023 — isolated incident, actual harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 686 — 42 CFR §483.25(b) — S/S: G
Nursing home report
BETHEL HOME
MONTEZUMA, KS · Medicare-certified · 56 beds
In good standing
Non-profit
5 of 5 overall
BETHEL HOME (MONTEZUMA, KS) has a 5 out of 5 overall rating, with strong staffing and quality results and no fines in the last 24 months. Its nurse staffing is 4.38 hours per resident per day, slightly above the federal benchmark of 4.1, while the health inspection rating is 4 out of 5 stars.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
4.3835 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: January 16, 2025Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.3835.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 0.51
- Licensed practical nurses
- 0.68
- Nurse aides
- 3.19
- Weekend nursing
- 3.87
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 31%
Registered nurse turnover: 17%
Resident outcomes
How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
10.5%Steady
Residents with a fall causing major injury
7.1%Worsening
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
4.9%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
0%Steady
Residents who lost too much weight
1.9%Worsening
Residents who were physically restrained
0%Steady
Residents needing more help with daily activities
14.9%Worsening
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
10.6%Worsening
Show all measures
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
24.5%Improving
Residents with a long-term catheter
3.4%Steady
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
14.4%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
0%Steady
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
94.5%Steady
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
99.5%Steady
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
85.2%Steady
What the inspectors found
The home failed to ensure nurses and nurse aides had the needed skills to care for each resident and support their well-being. Cited February 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 726 — 42 CFR §483.35 — S/S: F
The home failed to have an ongoing quality review group that finds problems and makes corrective plans. Cited February 2023 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 867 — 42 CFR §483.75 — S/S: F
The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited January 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited January 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: E
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 7 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 6 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- Non profit - Church related
- Occupancy
- 55.5 residents on an average day (99% of 56 beds)
- Resident voice
- Resident council
- Medicare history
- Certified for 13 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.