The home failed to keep residents’ personal and medical records private and confidential. Cited February 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 583 — 42 CFR §483.10 — S/S: E
Nursing home report
Aspen Ridge of Utah Valley
Orem, UT · Medicare-certified · 24 beds
In good standing
For-profitChain member
Data as of July 1, 2026
5 of 5 overall
Aspen Ridge of Utah Valley has an overall 5 out of 5 stars, with 5-star ratings for health inspections, staffing, and quality measures. Reported nurse staffing is 6.53 hours per resident day, above the federal benchmark of 4.1, and there were no fines in the last 24 months; recent inspection citations included record privacy, infection prevention and control, and pressure ulcer care.
Facility ratings
Health inspections
Staffing
6.5349 hrs/resident/day
Quality measures
Last inspection: March 19, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 6.5349.
Staffing detail
- Registered nurses
- 2.69
- Licensed practical nurses
- 0.49
- Nurse aides
- 3.36
- Weekend nursing
- 5.15
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 46%
Registered nurse turnover: 20%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%0%No change
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—99.5%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
98.9%98.7%No change
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited February 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to provide proper pressure ulcer care and failed to prevent new pressure sores from developing. Cited February 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 686 — 42 CFR §483.25(b) — S/S: D
The home failed to properly label and securely store medications and biologicals. Cited February 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 761 — 42 CFR §483.45(g) — S/S: D
The home failed to provide proper bladder and bowel care, including catheter care and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. Cited July 2022 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 690 — 42 CFR §483.25(e) — S/S: D
Recent history
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
- INSPECTION
Health inspection found 7 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Part of ADVANCED HEALTH CARE · 26 homes · 4.8 stars avg
- Occupancy
- 20.9 residents on an average day (87% of 24 beds)
- Medicare history
- Certified for 16 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.