ASBURY TOWERS HEALTH CARE CENTER in Greencastle, IN has an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, with strong staffing at 5 stars and nurse staffing above the federal benchmark (5.88 vs. 4.1 hours per resident day). It has 4 stars for health inspections, 3 stars for quality measures, $0 in fines over the last 24 months, and recent inspection citations related to dementia care training, resident rights, and transfer/discharge documentation.
Last inspection: March 30, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 5.878.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
1.09
Licensed practical nurses
1.02
Nurse aides
3.77
Weekend nursing
4.98
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 57%
Registered nurse turnover: 56%
Resident outcomes
How often residents experience these outcomes, with the direction over the past year.
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
37.8%Steady
Residents with a fall causing major injury
2.5%Steady
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
1%Steady
Residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9%Steady
Residents who lost too much weight
3.8%Steady
Residents who were physically restrained
0%Steady
Residents needing more help with daily activities
11.1%Steady
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
9.9%Steady
Show all measures
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
33.3%Steady
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
1.6%Steady
Residents with a long-term catheter
1.3%Steady
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
17.9%Steady
Residents with depressive symptoms
16.4%Steady
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
95.8%Steady
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
72.2%Steady
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
61.9%Steady
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
69.4%Improving
What the inspectors found
The home failed to properly train staff about dementia care and how to recognize and report abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Cited November 2022 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 943 — 42 CFR §483.95 — S/S: E
The home failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and could make their own choices and communicate freely. Cited March 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 550 — 42 CFR §483.10(a) — S/S: D
The home failed to give an adequate reason and proper information when transferring or discharging a resident. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 622 — 42 CFR §483.15 — S/S: D
The home failed to make food and drinks appealing and served them at a safe, appetizing temperature. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 804 — 42 CFR §483.60 — S/S: D
The home failed to make sure food was safely sourced, stored, prepared, and served according to professional standards. Cited March 2025 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 812 — 42 CFR §483.60(i) — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 7 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of STERLING HEALTHCARE · 5 homes · 3.2 stars avg
Occupancy
30.3 residents on an average day (63% of 48 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 19 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.