Appleton Area Health in Appleton, MN has a 3 out of 5 overall rating. Its staffing rating is low at 1 out of 5, though reported nurse staffing is 4.81 hours per resident per day, above the 4.1-hour federal benchmark; health inspection and quality measures are both 4 out of 5, with $0 in fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: April 15, 2026Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.8091.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.84
Licensed practical nurses
0.90
Nurse aides
3.07
Weekend nursing
3.94
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 34%
Registered nurse turnover: 50%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—20%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
3.2%0%Improving
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
5.9%3.3%Improving
Residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2%7.7%Worsening
Residents who lost too much weight
4%4.2%No change
Residents who were physically restrained
0%0%No change
Residents needing more help with daily activities
8.3%17.4%Worsening
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—16.8%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
16%12.5%Improving
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
—0%—
Residents with a long-term catheter
2.7%2.9%No change
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
14.6%19.1%Worsening
Residents with depressive symptoms
4.2%0%Improving
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—100%—
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
100%96.2%Worsening
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—80.7%—
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to provide and carry out an infection prevention and control program to help keep residents from getting or spreading infections. Cited January 2025 — widespread issue, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 880 — 42 CFR §483.80(a) — S/S: F
The home failed to monitor antibiotic use properly. Cited January 2025 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 881 — 42 CFR §483.80 — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality. Cited April 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 658 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(3) — S/S: D
The home failed to complete and keep the resident’s care plan properly prepared, reviewed, and updated by the right health professionals. Cited January 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 657 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(2) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited January 2026 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 1 health deficiency.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 3 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
Government - City
Occupancy
28.3 residents on an average day (60% of 47 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 44 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.