Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation in Mesa, AZ has an overall 5-star rating, with strong quality measures and health inspection scores, though staffing is only 3 stars. Reported nurse staffing is 4.14 hours per resident per day, just above the 4.1-hour federal benchmark, and there were no fines in the last 24 months.
Last inspection: November 20, 2024Penalties, last 24 months: $0
Federal guidance recommends at least 4.1 nursing hours per resident each day. This facility reports 4.1444.
Staffing detail
Registered nurses
0.56
Licensed practical nurses
1.18
Nurse aides
2.41
Weekend nursing
3.42
Hours per resident per day.
Total staff turnover: 46%
Registered nurse turnover: 47%
Resident outcomes
Each measure compares a year ago with the most recent quarter. Green means the facility moved the right way; red means the wrong way.
Negative outcomes
Lower is better — fewer affected residents. A decrease is good (green); an increase is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents on antipsychotic medication
—0%—
Residents with a fall causing major injury
—0%—
Residents with pressure ulcers (bedsores)
—3.9%—
Residents with a urinary tract infection
—0%—
Residents who lost too much weight
—3.1%—
Residents who were physically restrained
—0%—
Residents needing more help with daily activities
—5.1%—
Residents whose ability to walk got worse
—4%—
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or sleep medication
—15%—
Short-stay residents newly given an antipsychotic
0%0%No change
Residents with a long-term catheter
—2.8%—
Residents with new or worsening incontinence
—38%—
Residents with depressive symptoms
—4.3%—
Positive outcomes
Higher is better — e.g. vaccinations. An increase is good (green); a decrease is concerning (red).
Last yrNowTrend
Long-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
—100%—
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine
—93.6%—
Short-stay residents given the pneumonia vaccine
98.8%99.5%Improving
What the inspectors found
The nursing home failed to post its nurse staffing information every day, so families could not easily see daily staffing levels. Cited November 2024 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 732 — 42 CFR §483.35(i) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to keep the area free of hazards and provide enough supervision to prevent accidents. Cited September 2023 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 689 — 42 CFR §483.25(d) — S/S: E
The nursing home failed to properly screen residents for mental health or intellectual disability needs before or during admission. Cited August 2022 — limited pattern, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 645 — 42 CFR §483.20 — S/S: E
The home failed to provide safe and appropriate breathing care when a resident needed it. Cited November 2024 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 695 — 42 CFR §483.25(i) — S/S: D
The nursing home failed to develop and carry out a complete care plan that met each resident’s needs with clear steps and timelines. Cited September 2023 — isolated incident, potential for harm.
View the original federal record
F-Tag 656 — 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) — S/S: D
Recent history
STAFFING
Reported nurse staffing met or exceeded the federal recommendation.
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 2 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 4 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
INSPECTION
Health inspection found 5 health deficiencies.
See what inspectors found
Operator & ownership
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Part of THE ENSIGN GROUP · 338 homes · 3.2 stars avg
Occupancy
66.1 residents on an average day (94% of 70 beds)
Resident voice
Resident council
Medicare history
Certified for 37 years
Things at a nursing home change — inspections, staffing, ownership, news.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services — public records, updated monthly. GoodStanding presents official records with plain-language summaries. Always visit a facility in person.